At dinner last night several people were lamenting the
plight of Syrian immigrants in Hungary and a small boy drowned off Turkey. Maybe
because I don’t watch TV, but read or hear my news, I miss the essential pathos
of these stories.
Therefore, I cannot dispel nagging questions like: Why are/were so
many Middle Eastern, Islamic countries--not only Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and
Bashir Al Assad’s Syria but countless others—dictatorships? Is there something
inherently paternalistic or non-democratic that requires a strongman to hold a state with variants of Islam
together, to keep civic order?
Were you flabbergasted watching the Egyptians endure the
misery of revolution; then around and vote for the Muslim Brotherhood, only to find
themselves back where they started? What does the endless, intractable standoff
between Israel and the Palestinians tell us?
Is there some correlation between the corporate Islamic
mindset and public life that leads an essentially undemocratic place? Has everybody forgotten
the Charlie Hebo affair? What
happened to Theo Van Gogh?
Living in Germany and France I found Europe a saner place
than here for its sensible gun control, reasonable (3-month) election
campaigns, social practices and other public policies. There, you are less
likely to get a county clerk taking it upon herself to defy federal law because
of religious principles.
I tend to agree with your assessment Keyron. And feel badly for the poor dispossed who want shelter and solace in new lands because we can't assess who's benign and who's the next indie rogue terrorist. I have no idea what it'd take for citizens Islamic countries to right their own civic ships; their inability to do so seems intractable.
ReplyDelete