The moment I committed to doing a profile of councilmen on the basis of their votes and public discussion, I had to confront the question of how to distinguish Councilman Mike Delaney and Riley Rausch. Each brings a distinct talent to the table—Delaney computer expertise; Rausch often asks perceptive questions, but over time, it seems not to have affected his vote.
For starters, there are far too many 5-0 votes on council, even on horrific issues like dissolving the Sidewalk Committee and passing an ordinance that is likely illegal. But if there is a split it’s typically 3-(Kelchen, Delaney and Rausch)-2 (Knepper and Hosch), which gives rise to some a serious ethical questions, especially with the kinds of issues it ends up resolving: Mike Beck wouldn’t get a free street if Delaney, Rausch and Kelchen hadn’t voted to give him one! YOU vote accordingly!
Mr. Delaney’s PC firm is not the first ethical question about businessmen on council—my mother spent the ‘50s & ‘60s scoffing at “that charade.” Recently, a citizen complained to me about Delaney providing council computers. He may have even got us a better deal--it just looks bad.
Speaking of ethics, Ms. Oliphant and others on the ballot have not bothered to come to council meetings and see what gives. No less offer an idea or objection in the 2-minute public comment period. Or show us they can write an ordinance by submitting one!
With the exception of Sue Knepper, who seems to care a great deal: she has been at every meeting for the last couple months.
I can't insist that business people on city council is categorically a bad deal. Check my next post which will take a look at the voting record and discussion of Bill Hosch.
No comments:
Post a Comment