Monday, March 7, 2022

A List of Questionable Actions of Previous City Administrator

 As Cascade is hiring a new city administrator I have been mulling over a new ordinance: namely that the city administrator come up for the approval of the people at every biennial election. Unlike the current recall, not part of a regular election, this would cost $0. Every two years we vote anyway. Same simple question every 2 years: Should the Cascade City Administrator _______ (insert name) be retained for another two years?   

            Consider t the 12-year reign of Randy Lansing. Easily six years into it, many people in town were aware of the problems still with us, especially the drainage problems on Industrial Dr. This is the biggest salary paid by the city and in a democracy people ought to have some control over it, and this simple ordinance would allow it.

            In order to provide the council with sufficient evidence from the most recent administrator’s tenure, I made the following list of violations of ordinances during her term:

    1)   In 2019 Cascade resident Nick Leytem had to apply for a variance for a new house because the city administrator authorized positioning the house too close to the lot line. (She may have figured it incorrectly.)

 2)      During the building of the City Pool the Administrator approved change order sums in access of $9,999 ($13,000) on the pool to upgrade the roof and other items, which should have had council approval.

 3)      An email that several of us have on our computers seems to indicate Ms. McCusker gave a building permit for an apartment complex on Tyler Street to a corporation which had agreed to build the curb and gutter in some arrangement. However, once the company got the permit, it erected 11th apartment (not authorized under the drainage plan originally filed) and subsequently refused to pay for or deal with the water problem. Ms. McCusker told me before she left that particular drainage issue has been placed back on the city’s construction list—people’s taxes will pay for it. Nonetheless, the company in question got a $20,000 TIF rebate for a new building.

 4)      On the 3 March 2021 edition of The Cascade Pioneer, the City Administrator was quoted on the front page talking about drainage saying, “… (runoff) it collects on the grass and soaks into the ground. It could be rock or a gravel parking lot, just something that’s not impervious like concrete because anything concrete or asphalt, it will just runoff.” A city administrator dealing with the serious drainage issues that confront a town like Cascade really has to understand how drainage works.

 5)       MACC Self-Storage may also have been permitted with inadequate green space between it and semi-repair business immediately to the south of it, though there is some.  The entire street is a problem. Like McAllister Electric and LLCC Repair, those buildings were permitted under a previous administrator. 

 6)      At the October 4th Park Board Meeting, Ms. McCusker stated that in a discussion about whether the Army Corps of Engineers had to be consulted about alterations or moving the old gazebo to a new spot. Someone asked about work, then underway, “Did they contact the Corps about work on the wall on the east side of the river?” She stated “The Army Corps doesn’t care what we do on the East Side of the river.”

 7)      A review of the building permits issued in 2021 indicates that a percentage of them were issued in violation of the 80-20 green space ordinance, also that only 3 councilmen were invited to sign off on them. Shouldn’t it have been a rotation of all five?

 No matter who is selected as administrator, we need this ordinance and to OK the performance of a $100,000-employee biennially.

No comments:

Post a Comment